Slate has published yet another response to Robert Sietsema's Eater post on the state of restaurant criticism, this time taking issue with his complaint about how quickly reviewers are now forced to file on new restaurants. Luke O'Neil writes: "The idea of giving a restaurant time to mature before you review it suggests romance, generosity, appreciation for serious artistry...And like most holdovers from the bygone glory days of print publishing, it's a notion whose time is long past." [Slate]
Filed under:
Loading comments...